10 Comments
User's avatar
Guids's avatar

re Actual Reports first impressions: solid small company that hasn't found the growth formula.

— do you have any idea what is growth formula? in most cases its burning shitload of money for customer acquisition. and huge dilution as a result. dont blame companies growing 50% wo raising a ton on shitty results, do better and find better ones

Expand full comment
Blin's avatar

Hope you enjoy tanker

Expand full comment
Blin's avatar

Brightspark lost 20%, 4.8 to 3.95— i lost a lot of money. Who cares?

Expand full comment
Cry me a river's avatar

Danube 4.5m, AR 5m , which one is a bargain?? Make your math. Dont look price of one token, think what you get as a return.

Expand full comment
Cry me a river's avatar

Also re Danube- not sure whats your investment strategy but its clearly designed by very emotional person. Startup investing is not rational business. In that phase you cannot predict anything of outcomes. Buy Tallinna Sadam instead and wait 4 pension. Im usual investor who dont understand your shitposts. Also i have investments in over 10 FB cos. Some win some lose value weekly. Im focused on longer term also im here to help companies to create value and jobs to Estonia. My investments are mostly at 2k per startup. If i get 2x return over year its too good anyways. I dont buy initial ipos, only aftermarket., dip I dont sell daily. GG

Expand full comment
Cry me a river's avatar

Cry me a river. Go and buy sone shady deals, stop posting bs about normal companies. Your behaviour results that only bs will be listed in FB and nobody in serious biz wants your rants and they dont list. Price is what you pay, value is what you get. 4 GG

Expand full comment
AutoFill's avatar

SWG can sell with what price they like, they even published it. You dont have to buy from them.

Expand full comment
blio's avatar

pointless hala

Expand full comment
Olavi's avatar

"Price manipulation" of less liquid shares comes to mind quite often. Every now and then I come across a price change that is a result of a single (usually very small) transaction which does not seem to be in line with current order list. A much higher buy when there is plenty available at lower price or a rather low sell when there is demand at higher value. Of course it may very well be just my imagination because it is very difficult to know whether a transaction is a buy or sell and to know the exact order list at the time. Also, I used quotes because I have not really noticed these transactions to have a meaningful long term effect, its just a short term change. Maybe a blogger needs to boost portfolio value or someone needs to pump a balance sheet, who knows. Or maybe I am just imagining things :D

Expand full comment
Nugis Aino's avatar

"A much higher buy when there is plenty available at lower price or a rather low sell when there is demand at higher value."

This was possible when there was no automatching, but not now as far as we can think of. This leaves plenty of possibilities for abuse indeed.

But there seems to be sort of "price grooming" happening now too: https://twitter.com/NugisAino/status/1414884442011750401

We can think of 2 valid reasons:

1) A lot of OÜs seem to be making money simply from spread. Back when orders weren't anonymous, you could see how the same company is buying at, say, 1,50 and selling at 1,70.

2) When our main holding is in loan notes, then in order to know about shareholder votes, we've bought tiny amounts of share units.

Expand full comment